Dear ProCon.org readers, we need your help. The average cost for ProCon.org to educate 26 people with nonpartisan research on important issues is $1. The average taxi fare in America is about $10. We are asking everyone who visits ProCon.org to donate the cost of one taxi ride – at least $10 – to this important charity. Without your support, the programs at ProCon.org that serve millions of students, teachers, and others cannot exist. Our charitable work is funded entirely by your donations. Thank you and happy holidays!
Physician-Assisted Suicide Act Approved for Massachusetts Ballot
|Friday, July 6, 2012 | ProCon.org | MORE HEADLINES|
According to the Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General, the Act would allow terminally-ill adults with six months or less to live to receive and self-administer a prescription for life-ending medication. To qualify, a patient would have to be an adult resident of Massachusetts who is "medically determined to be mentally capable of making and communicating health care decisions; has been diagnosed by attending and consult physicians as having an incurable, irreversible disease that will, within reasonable medical judgment, cause death within six months; and voluntarily expresses a wish to die and has made an informed decision."
Doctors would be required to inform patients about other end-of-life care options, including palliative care, pain management, and hospice care. Two physicians must verify the mental competence of the terminally ill patient and the voluntary nature of the request, and three requests must be made by the patient for the prescription: two oral and one written. The Act would also allow the patient to change his or her mind at any time. No person would be civilly or criminally liable or subject to professional discipline for actions that comply with the law.
"We've received an overwhelmingly positive response from people across Massachusetts who believe terminally ill patients deserve greater control over their end-of-life care," said Michael Clarke, campaign director for Dignity 2012. "These decisions are deeply intimate and personal, and belong in the hands of individuals, not the government."
The Roman Catholic Bishops of Massachusetts came out strongly against the proposed Death with Dignity Act, saying that it "effectively authorizes the killing of human beings prior to their natural death," and that "a compassionate society should work to prevent suicide, which is always a terrible tragedy, no matter what form it may take."
The Boston Archdiocese, the Massachusetts Medical Society, the Massachusetts Family Institute, and the Massachusetts Citizens for Life have all indicated plans to mount a campaign to defeat the proposal, saying in a joint statement that it is "fraught with the potential for error and could be used to compel older, ill adults to end their lives."
A Western New England University poll conducted on May 29, 2012, found that 60 percent of Massachusetts voters supported "allowing people who are dying to legally obtain medication that they could use to end their lives."
Oregon and Washington voters approved their versions of the Death with Dignity Act in 1994 and 2008 respectively. A Montana district court ruled on Dec. 5, 2008 that state residents have the legal right to physician-assisted suicide. The Montana Supreme Court affirmed on Dec. 31, 2009 that physician-assted suicide is "not against public policy."
Kimberly Ashton, "Pot, Death with Dignity and Right-to-Repair Initiatives Likely to Make Fall Ballot," hamilton-wenham.patch.com, July 2, 2012